This case involves a patient who suffered severe injuries after an allergic reaction to amoxicillin. The patient first presented to the defending clinic located in Mississippi for a surgical procedure. His preoperative paper work clearly stated that he had an allergy to penicillin, however he was prescribed amoxicillin by the defendant post-operatively. Four days later, he presented to the drug store and filled the prescription for amoxicillin. The allergy information listed on his pharmacy records included penicillin as well, but amoxicillin was dispensed to him nevertheless. Two days later, the patient presented to the hospital with an anaphylactic reaction to the amoxicillin prescribed and dispensed by the defendants. Two months later, the patient presented to a neurological surgeon with complaints of severe headaches, tunnel vision, floaters in his eyes, flashing lights in his peripheral vision, and vertigo-like symptoms following the original allergic reaction to amoxicillin. An MRI was preformed, which demonstrated a pineal glad cyst. The neurosurgeon stated that his allergic reaction to amoxicillin had caused the pineal glad lesion to become inflamed or expansile, producing aqueductal stenosis and symptoms of obstructive hydrocephalus. He continues to have severe, daily headaches, tunnel vision with floaters, dizziness, short term memory loss, difficulty sleeping, decreased cognitive function as well as new onset of multiple allergies and asthma. It is alleged that amoxicillin should not have been dispensed to the patient since he had a known allergy for penicillin.