This case takes place in Louisiana and involves a middle aged patient who suffered burns after a cosmetic procedure. The plaintiff saw the defending plastic surgeon for laser liposuction procedure using “Smart-lipo” machinery, and was told that the “Smart-lipo” was a low risk procedure. The plastic surgeon then performed the procedure on the plaintiff’s abdomen and flanks. Post-surgery, the patient was found to have suffered extensive burns, and is left with residual scarring around the mid-section. The plaintiff alleges the type of burns suffered indicates the that there was inadequate monitoring of the laser, stating that it was too close to the skin for too long and that the surgeon did not monitor the temperature controls.
Question(s) For Expert Witness
- 1. Can you briefly outline your experience in "Smart-lipo" laser liposuction procedures?
-
2. How do ensure the safety of the patient and to avoid any complications such as severe burns?
Expert Witness Response E-006312
In my opinion, it is unacceptable to suffer “extensive burns” and have “residual scarring” due to Smart-lipo. Inadequate monitoring of internal and external temperatures and/or being too superficial are certainly potential causes of such burns. I have performed Smart-lipo for years and have never had a burn on a patient. I use internal and external temperature monitoring (ThermaGuide). I would be pleased to review this case.
Contact this expert witness
Related Posts
This claim involves alleged misconduct by various individuals who were employed by financial institutions based in Washington to oversee the donor advised fund of a wealthy couple. The donors, a married couple of advanced age, suffered from dementia. The husband…
This case takes place in Iowa and involves an older male patient. The patient had a morphine pump placed due to chronic back pain; however the morphine pump failed to alleviate the patient’s pain, so the defending neurosurgeon removed it.…